Philip

    Gender: Male
    Location: Auckland NZ
    Relationship: Single
    Orientation: Gay
    Children: Not for Me
    Body Type: Slim / Slender
    Height: 5'8"
    Religion: Taoist
    Ethnicity: White / Caucasian
    About Me: I describe myself as a creative philanthropist. I work as a consultant, comedian, columnist, recovering social worker and human rights activist, among other things. I am gay, vegetarian, English and has unique function.
    Music: Linkin Park, Our Lady Peace, My Chemical Romance, Pink, Snow Patrol, Blink 182, Plain White Ts, and more
    Movies: Matrix, My Own Private Idaho, Mysterious Skin, Broke Back Mountain
    TV: In the background
    Books: I'll think about that and get back to you..
    Likes: I'll think about that and get back to you..
    Dislikes: I'll think about that and get back to you..
    Hobbies: I'll think about that and get back to you..
    Vices: I'll think about that and get back to you..
    Virtues: I'll think about that and get back to you..
    Heroes: I'll think about that and get back to you..

    See more blogs here

    Monday, October 29, 2007, 01:50 PM [General]

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Getting WISE™ about the future

    Monday, October 29, 2007, 01:46 PM [General]

    Let me tell you about a new way of being for me, inspired by a profound new wisdom I acquired recently, on retreat with the NZ Social Entrepreneur Fellowship.

    The wisdom was a combination of a learning and a subsequent realisation, which came to me during a discussion we had after watching a talk given by Charles Handy at the 2007 Skoll World Forum on Social Entrepreneurship in Oxford / UK — March 2007 about philanthropy and social change. The presentation - case studies of private philanthropists donating generously in acts such as feeding homeless people - was controversial among our group. We debated the social value of such random acts of kindness. I was conflicted: on one hand I was inspired by the presentation - both Handy’s polished yet casually engaging style and the idea of myself one being able to use money to add scale to social change. But I agreed with the criticisms that simply providing free food does nothing to solve the complex causes of homelessness.

    The paradox of arguably ill-informed goodwill is a tricky area and our discussion was lengthy and passionate. I personally think there is no answer to the anomaly until we completely reorganise our social structure and adopt a hybrid form of capitalism and socialism. But this blog has a less lofty focus, though I must write about socialist capitalism in the near future.

    In the course of our collective musings, the definition of philanthropy was raised and it was this tack that provoked for me learning and realisation that may change my life. Why be modest?: It will probably change the world.

    Learning: The term “philanthropy” means more than just the act of donating money to welfare, charity or social innovation. Its wider meaning includes an “altruistic concern for human welfare and advancement [and] generosity to socially useful purposes[1].”

    Realisation: I practice philanthropy quite a lot. In fact, it’s probably what I do most of the time. As a social entrepreneur I work, sometimes paid, sometimes not, in socially useful ways, motivated by a concern for human welfare and advancement. And my donation is the time, energy, ideas and creativity I invest in my philanthropic pursuits.

    This wisdom has given rise to a new identity - a new way for the world to recognise me. From now on I will describe myself professionally as a creative philanthropist. This explains precisely what I do in terms of the synergy of the roles I act in, from comedian and disability arts promoter, to consultant, trainer and strategic advisor. For years I’ve struggled with identifying with one or even a combination of these roles because they are only sub-identities - alone they do not describe the fullness of my impact on, relationship with or place in, the world.

    It’s the same with personal adjectives like gay, disabled, vegetarian, male, european, etc. They are only part of who I am, yet in society these are the descriptors we use to group ourselves. Often, we use these and other labels to divide ourselves and, in extreme cases, neglect, hurt and even kill each other (religious identity in the Middle East is a pertinent example).

    I have described how, having recognised a new wisdom, I was able to create a new identity that accurately encompassed the synergy of roles (sub-identities) I already have. The final part of this process is to develop a new expression of this wisdom, identity and synergy. Expression is important part of manifesting into reality the potential I’ve created. There are three things I can do: firstly I now think about myself and everything I do as creative philanthropy; secondly I now talk about myself and what I do as creative philanthropy; and thirdly I now do things that a creative philanthropist would do. Interestingly, that includes making a regular donation to a philanthropic pursuit - in my case Diversityworks Trust, which is planning Momentum’09, an international disability arts symposium.

    Getting WISE™ (wisdom, identity, synergy, expression) about the future is my new transformational paradigm for individuals, groups and organisations. It’s a creative way of evaluating past and present impact and designing future potential.

    For me it has begun a process of acting on the inspiration of Charles Handy’s presentation - by donating a small but regular amount to the Trust I begin to use money to add scale to social change.

    What could it do for you?

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Random thoughts of drunk rugby players and healthc

    Monday, October 29, 2007, 01:44 PM [General]

    While listening to early morning talkback, two topics of discussion almost prompted me to call in:

    Firstly, All Black Doug Howlett’s drunken rampage in London: The discussion was around whether his actions and apology were acceptable or not. My stance: It doesn’t matter - just like it is best to ignore the bad behaviour of a child, the media should not reward anti-social behaviour from public figures by making it headlines.

    Secondly, the host was lamenting the demise of public healthcare, blaming all political parties for failing to meet the needs of those needing surgery, for example, by classifying it as elective and making them wait in pain and discomfort. My stance: we place far too much emphasis on restorative healthcare, helplessly letting conditions worsen until they are so bad radical intervention is needed. Our focus needs to be on preventing the need for curative remedies by using natural, preventative measures.

    There, I said it. I feel better now!

    0 (0 Ratings)

Blog Categories